Modal Constructions in Sociological Arguments∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper introduces modal logics to a sociological audience. We first provide an overview of the formal properties of this family of models and outline key differences with classical first-order logic. We then build a model to represent processes of perception and belief core to social theories. To do this, we define our multi-modal language and then add substantive constraints that specify the inferential behavior of modalities for perception, default, and belief. We illustrate the deployment of this language to the theory of legitimation proposed by Hannan, Pólos, and Carroll (2007). This paper aims to call attention to the potential benefits of modal logics for theory building in sociology. ∗We thank the Stanford Graduate School of Business and Durham Business School for financial support.
منابع مشابه
Temporal and Modal Anaphora in Sign Language (ASL)
We suggest that data from American Sign Language (ASL) provide overt evidence for Partee’s and Stone’s claim that natural language has anaphoric constructions in the temporal and modal domains (Partee 1973, Stone 1997). We provide four arguments. (i) Like nominal and locative expressions, temporal and modal constructions can establish loci which can then be indexed by later pronouns. (ii) As is...
متن کاملAntecedent Priming at Trace Positions: Evidence from German Scrambling
In Chomsky's theory of grammar, syntactic representations are said to contain movement traces, i.e., syntactically active but phonetically null copies of displaced constituents. Correspondingly, traces have been claimed to form part of the processing of sentence structure by showing that at trace sites the parser reactivates a moved constituent. This view has been contested, however, by researc...
متن کاملAutomatic Extraction of Implicit Interpretations from Modal Constructions
This paper presents an approach to extract implicit interpretations from modal constructions. Importantly, our approach uses a deterministic procedure to normalize eventualities and generate potential interpretations. An annotation effort demonstrates that these interpretations are intuitive to humans and most modal constructions convey at least one interpretation. Experimental results show tha...
متن کاملExpectations in the field of the Internet and health: an analysis of claims about social networking sites in clinical literature
This article adopts a critical sociological perspective to examine the expectations surrounding the uses of social networking sites (SNSs) articulated in the domain of clinical literature. This emerging body of articles and commentaries responds to the recent significant growth in SNS use, and constitutes a venue in which the meanings of SNSs and their relation to health are negotiated. Our ana...
متن کاملOn the Formalization of the Modal µ-Calculus in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions
We present a Natural Deduction proof system for the propositional modal μ-calculus, and its formalization in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions. We address several problematic issues, such as the use of higher-order abstract syntax in inductive sets in presence of recursive constructors, the formalization of modal (sequent-style) rules and of context sensitive grammars. The formalization c...
متن کامل